Blog

Do not let price worship hinder encryption



The cryptocurrency is often displayed through the narrow lens of the price. The dominant narration surrounding Bitcoin, Ethereum, and the broader encryption market are installed on one idea: the numbers rise. Did Bitcoin break $ 100,000? Is double Ethereum in one month? Is this altcoin goes to the moon?

Financial media, X Pundits, and even encryption defenders routinely reduce a full technological revolution to the racing racing for higher prices than ever. But this is similar to the Apple or NVIDIA evaluation only through their stock movements while ignoring iPhone or graphics processing units that operate the Infrastructure Infrastructure. It is a superficial thinking – and in encryption, it is also dangerous.

In traditional markets, the value is ultimately based on use. The more products that the company sells, the more revenues it achieved. The higher the number of users who keep it, the greater the effect of his network. Apple is not a $ 3 trillion company just because of the high price of its share; This is because more than a billion people use its ecosystem daily. Nafidia did not become my beloved Wall Street from the absolute momentum. The most important chips of the AI ​​era were built. The price of the stock follows the suitability of the product market. In encryption, this principle is often inverted – the price comes first, and everything becomes secondary or optional.

Read more: Ethereum William Mougayar’s lawyer for the leadership of the new ecosystems initiative

This philosophy is not in the depth of more depth than what can be called sicur-an ideology promoted by Michael Sailor from Microstrategy, which is the original missionary of Bitcoin as a plural. Under this global view, the basic bitcoin utility does not deal, build or innovate – it simply holds. You can buy bitcoin, never sell, borrow against it, repeat. Use is storage.

Bitcoin is not a currency or a platform under the siclor – it is a speculative cellar, designed to appreciate forever and justify more borrowing. In essence, each Bitcoin Fund Company becomes beneficial, and build a capital structure about one bet: that the number always rises.

This is a radical exit from the logic that supports health companies. Traditional companies grow by creating value to others, through products, services and infrastructure. Under the slicer, the value is absorbed, circular, and frequently repeated: buy more bitcoin because it rises, which makes it rise, which justifies buying more. It is similar to Ponzi’s mentality for companies, not legally, but in structural dynamics, as external adoption is less than the internal leverage. The market does not need new users, but only needs current owners to continue faith.

Compare this to Ethereum, the second largest encrypted currency depending on the maximum market, which took a different path. While Ethereum is also subject to the withdrawal of gravity to price speculation, and no one argues that the “number rises” does not matter; A suggestion of its value is mainly rooted in use. Eth is not just a value store. It is the fuel of the economy. It operates decentralized requests, settling billions of dollars in Stablecoin transactions, coding assets in the real world, NFTS, facilitates decentralized financing, and supports the ruling. ETH asks that the network has a request. The more people who use ETHEREUM, the higher the eth. The more ETH is burned with transaction fees, the more restricted the offer. The price here reflects the activity, not just belief.

This distinction is deep. Ethereum growth is associated with its functions, providing users and developers. It is more like traditional business than just a cellar. It is like Amazon in the early first decade of the twentieth century: it is difficult to estimate traditional standards but serves an increased environmental system.

The difference between these two models – Bitcoin as gold and ethereum as an endless debate about whether they even in competition. Some argue that they are completely different types: Bitcoin is a cash metal; Ethereum is a decentralized world computer, and may resemble digital oil.

It is fair to ask: What is in the end more valuable, and the gold you keep or the dollar you spend? Bitcoin value depends on the people who hold it. Ethereum value depends on the people who use it. They both succeed, but the paths are not the same.

If the cryptocurrency is developing beyond the speculative adolescence, it must turn away from the mania of prices and the mania of benefit. This means asking more difficult questions: What does this protocol use? Who depends on that? What is the problem that you solve? The evaluation should come from sharing, not just the price. Blockchain that provides benefit in the real world for financing, identity, coordination or account is worth appreciating. But you must gain it through adoption, not ideology.

What if you find, instead of competition, Bitcoin and Ethereum are a common ground and worked together?

This is where the opportunity is shown: ETHEREUM as a stronger gateway for Bitcoin holders looking to reach the wider world of decentralized financing. There is no ETHEREUM network in terms of depth and maturity of Defi. By converting BTC into assets compatible with ETHEREUM, holders can engage in a dynamic ecosystem of lending, trick, generating return, turning sleeping bitcoin into active capital and producing value. Pits such as AAVE, Lido, Ethena, Ether.fi and Maker have been able to participate in ways that cannot be kept simply.

The result?

Mutual benefit: Ethereum attracts more liquidity, while Bitcoin acquires a benefit that is needed. It is a strong synergy that inflated the strengths of both networks.

The cryptocurrency is not just stupid financial assets, it is programming money, digital property, friction -free transactions, decentralized coordination, and unreliable financing. It is a re -imagination of the economic class of the Internet. However, its long -term success depends on the dopamine exceeding the daily price plans. Because in the end, the most valuable technologies are not the ones that have the most obvious brochure; They are used to.

And use, not storage, is what builds a permanent value.




publish_date

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button