Blog

The judge recommends that Logan Paul cannot share blame on Cryptozoo


YouTube Logan Paul should not be allowed to blame the participating creators for the failure of the Crypto Project Cryptozoo project to escape a lawsuit, and an American judge has advised.

On Tuesday, Judge Ronald Griffin urged a federal court in Austin, Texas, to reject Paul’s request to virtual ruling against Cryptozoo founders, Eduardo Eibanz and Jake Greenpom in a lawsuit by the non -suspicious symbolic buyers on the guarantee who demanded the project.

“It would undoubtedly lead to inconsistent rulings,” Judge Griffin said to allow Paul’s request, who will witness the court’s ruling against Ebanyez and Greenbum without trial because they did not want.

A group of Cryptozoo Nft buyer Fif up a lawsuit against PaulIBanez, Greenbaum and other project participants in early 2023, claiming that he was “the pulling of the rug” and the promised privileges that were not achieved.

Urine Anti -claim Against Ibanz and Greenbaum in January 2024, claiming that he rented the duo to help manage the project, but they ridiculed it, causing the collapse of Cryptozoo.

The Cryptozoo hypothesis was the players who buy NFT “EGGS” for “Hatch” to animals that can be raised to create hybrid animals to be traded for symbols. source: Cryptozoo

Cryptozoo was launched in 2021 and NFTS appeared along with a symbolic symbol, but a Blockchain game is not launched.

The lawsuit can collapse if Paul’s request is allowed: the judge

Judge Griffin said that Paul’s attempt to blame Ebanez, Greenbauum and “instill them for the fall of Cryptozoo and any caused injury” can not see the lawsuit does not go anywhere because the husband did not appear in court.

He added: “On its essence, this case calls on the court to determine whether both defendants have committed a form of fraudulent actions in the upgrade and operation of Cryptozoo.”

“If the court grants the virtual ruling and thus blames Ebanyez and Greenbum, what will the claimants’ claims regarding Paul and other defendants? “

Paul offered against his participants’ founders only and not the allegations made by buyers buyers, but Judge Griffin said, “It has not been proven-and the court-based on the nature of his claims, there are any low risks of inconsistent judgments.”

The judge added that “the court believes that the defendants are in a similar situation and possess close defenses, and the defendants are paid some pressure from shared responsibility, and most importantly, to judge Paul’s proposal at this time that undoubtedly leads to inconvenient rulings.”

Paul in a legal battle with YouTube on Cryptozoo claims

In a separate lawsuit in June 2024, Paul FindeisenKnown as “Coffezilla”, claiming that he made definition statements about Cryptozoo in a series of videos.

Related to: The American Court of Appeal is turned

judge That complaint allowed To move forward in March, Findeisen asked at the same time to join the case with the case against Paul by Cryptozoo Nft buyers, which Paul opposed.

Cryptozoo Nft buyer recovery

In January 2023, Paul promised a plan for Cryptozoo and after a year, set aside $ 2.3 million to recover For Cryptozoo buyers, on condition that the owners of those demanding agree not to sue the project.

Paul recovered 0.1 Ether (ETH) buyers, the same amount that was originally sold in 2021.

NFT Car: Jack Potcher is not a fan of royalties NFT: