The recent crashing of October 10 is the Biggest extermination Crypto market history event. More than $ 19 B is liquidAccording to coinglass data, leading to a $ 65 B Refusing to open interest. This number is dwarf other memorable cascades of extermination such as Covid-19 crash with $ 1.2 b, or even Falling FTX to $ 1.6 B in liquids.
Subsequently, the investigators will arise that the event is at least partially caused by the weak pricing of the oracles in Binance Exchange. The collateral value of three pegged crypto tokens, especially USDE, BNSOL and WBeth, is determined from internal Binance order data rather than an external Oracle. It puts users of the “united account” feature at the risk of extermination during market irregularities.
It is possible that this weakness was exploited in a coordinated attack on October 10, but the evidence remains irreversible. UseIn particular, contributed to cascading liquidations with an estimated volume of $ 346 m, compared to thing with $ 169 m and bnsol By $ 77 M. The removal of the mass of liquidity in a pair of stablecoin should be considered especially suspicious.
Using exclusively obtained, grain grain from Our partners at AI-Driven Market Analytics Firm Rena is good, Cointelegraph research Naissect unusual activity in USDE/USDT Trade pair in this article.
A Mass Liquidity Meltdown
Rena’s anomaly anomaly has recorded one of the sharp and most complex dislocations in the market Stablecoin trade. This is surprising because there are no concerns about the properness of the USDE collateral, unlike the previous UST and USDC Degs. USDE mints and redemptions Continue to work as usual. However, professional market manufacturers withdrew liquidity from the pair to a massive size. Some of these may be attributed to automatic risk marking systems, which initiate defense removal quotes to limit exposure.
Prior to the collapse, the average total liquidity for USDE was at $ 89 m with a balanced purchase structure and sell orders. Between 21:40 and 21:55 UTC, Binance’s pairing in pairs collapsed nearly 74%, falling to nearly $ 23 M. Around 21:54, the market depth was almost completely gone. Total liquidity has dropped to just a $ 2 m and the market production activity is effectively lost. As a side-effects, the bid-ask spreads a crack up to 22%.
The market has lost the integrity of its structure in crashing. Trade volume advanced a factor of 896 times while the depth of the ask-side collapsed 99%. The imbalance pushed the USDE price up to $ 0.68 in the Binance’s spot market, as it remained close to the peg with other exchanges.
In the 10 -minute period of crisis, trading intensity rose almost 16 times compared to the normal rate of 108 trade per minute. It peeked at nearly 3000 trading per minute, with 92% of them selling orders. Many of the orders can be attributed to the seller’s panic, stopping the loss of triggers and forced fluids.
Evidence of anomaly activity in the market
However, abnormal activity was detected by the Rena machine anomaly before the USDE liquidity crisis occurred. Around 21:00 UTC, it reported 28 anomalies, a rate four times higher than the previous time. The anomalies recorded by this machine include unusual spikes in volume, price, or trade intensity, and weakening patterns, specific explosions, clusters, and trading compliance. It also involves fingerprinting activity character Spoofing.
Three unique volleys of large orders before the crisis can be found in the size of the order book profile. These orders were placed when the BTC began to go down to major exchanges, but before the USDE entered a liquidity crunch.
The event features destruction and action that is still present in the crypto market, where cascading avoidance can eliminate what will appear safe trade. Like 99% drawdowns in some altcoins during the crash, USDE DepEg shows that the market for many tokens has minimal demand that is organic to support it. In the absence of large market manufacturers such as Wintermute, the orders of many crypto assets have shown minimal stability.
This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every transfer of investment and trading involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when deciding.
This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be done as legal or investment advice. The views, attitudes, and opinions expressed here are unique and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of the cointelegraph.
Cointelegraph does not endorse the content of this article or any product mentioned here. Readers should do their own research before taking any action related to any product or company mentioned and bring full responsibility for their decisions.
