Blog

Tokenized bank deposits are inferior to StableCoins: Professor


Banks and financial institutions have begun experimenting with tokenized bank deposits, bank balances recorded on a blockchain, but the technology is doomed to be lost to StableCoins, according to Omid Malekan, an adjunct professor at Columbia Business School.

Overcollateralized StableCoin IssuersWho must maintain 1:1 cash or short-term cash equivalent reserves to back their tokens, is safer from a liability perspective than fractional reserve banks that will issue tokenized bank deposits, Malekan said.

Stablecoins are also composable, meaning they can be moved throughout the crypto ecosystem and used in a variety of applications, unlike tokenized deposits, which allow, have Know-your-customer (KYC) controls, and has restricted functionality.

Banks, Bank Accounts, StableCoin, RWA, RWA Tokenization
StableCoins continue to grow as an asset class. Source: Rwa.xyz

Tokenized bank deposits are like a “checking account where you can only write checks to other customers of the same bank,” Malekan continued. He added:

“What’s the point? Such a token cannot be used for most activities. It is useless for cross-border payments, cannot serve the undefined, does not offer composability or atomic swaps with other assets, and cannot be used in decentralized finance (defi).”

The tokenized real-world asset (RWA) sector, physical or financial assets tokenized on a blockchain, which includes fiat currencies, real estate, equities, bonds, commodities, art, and collectibles, is It is expected to swell to $ 2 trillion by 2028, according to Standard Chartered Bank.

Related: BNY explores tokenized deposits to power $2.5T daily payment network: Bloomberg

StableCoin issuers will share one way or another

Tokenized bank deposits must also compete yield-bearing stablecoins or StableCoin issuers finding ways around the yield ban in the Genius Stablecoin Act, passing the yield in the form of various customer rewards, Malekan argued.