Opinion by: Alex Nguyen, CEO in Vibrantx
The source of the programming language transfer is not too much cypherpunk. Facebook (now Meta) has created a move after the Libra/Diem team compared to the key languages of the smart contract (Bitcoin’s script, bytecode of the Ethereum Virtual Machine) and decided their effective home talent tech can create a new language developed in years of private and public research sectors.
The original team, including founders Mo Shaikh, Avery Ching, and their engineering team, left Facebook to continue as a fully independent, open resource led by Aptos Labs and supported by the Aptos Foundation.
Important, important, Experiment failed in Libra of Meta A programming language left us specifically designed for crypto finances. The transfer to the aptos is now open, and the Aptos Foundation is a commercial -driven organization that welcomes builders from all backgrounds.
Moving is now the best language of programming for validation of the absence of bugs and checking for changes and leakage, which is how most blockchains are inhack.
This validation depends on the two main features of the transition to the aptos: (1) “backward compatibility” and (2) the concept of a “Runtime auditor.”
Backward compatibility means proof of the future
Moving to aptos is fast and inexpensive, creating a competitive user experience, especially for decentralized applications (DEFI) applications. Aptos aims for a high transaction by transaction, with theoretical capabilities reaching up to 160,000 transactions per second (TPS) through the parallel implementation of the engine, block-STM.
Aptos sub-second finality means that transactions are quickly confirmed, enhancing the user’s experience with timely sensitive applications.
To be fair, other chains also have these qualities. The transition to the aptos is, however, designed to be “compatible with backwards.”
Future upgrades will not interfere with existing projects. This will help developers feel more confident developing long-term solutions without worrying about things damaged due to a transfer upgrade.
Moving smart contracts is designed to be upgraded without affecting the user experience, which is important for mainstream adoption. This allows teams to implement bug repair and new features with zero interruption.
Recently: Crypto startups can’t only rely on solid tech to win VC funding: Okx
The flexibility of the contract by moving to specific aptos security features results in better and faster shipping of the product. Being more flexible, the transition to the aptos can quickly adapt to support new ecosystems.
“Bytecode” prevents the verification of leaks
Solidity contract hacks have been widespread in recent years. When building Web3 technology for markets worth billions -billion or even trillion dollars, it is important to have a security system that protects projects from resource leaks, improper access to memory and other unauthorized changes.
As it was first developed for the Meta’s Diem project, the move was designed for safety, resource management and performance, making it attractive -for developers looking for a safe but stable language for smart contracts.
When removing the code with the transfer, the code will be proven in many important coding conditions such as proper resource management, typing of accuracy and safety reference. No matter what happens in the code, first prove to prevent any faulty or malicious intelligent contracts from running.
This is the strength of the built-in bytecode verification of the transition.
Real-time verification of absence of bugs
Known computer science pioneer Edsger Dijkstra mentioned, “The program testing can be used to show the presence of bugs, but never show their absence!”
Formal transfer verification capabilities Let developers really prove that there are no bugs in specific code according to preset specifications.
Movevm is less tested in battle than the Virtual Machine of Ethereum, but as Rushi Manche, founder of movement lab, is explained, the transition requires less auditing the code. Movevm Runtime can act as a “Runtime Auditor.”
The verifier within Movevm ensures that the transaction code is harmless and it cannot create, double or destroy resources that the transaction signer (s) does not allow. In other words, Movevm is a “Runtime” auditor instead of a human contract auditor.
Today, the transition to the aptos is more than a smart language of the contract. Moving to aptos is the longest standing, most recognized and widely used version of the transition, boasting one of the fastest growing developer communities and a rapidly growing ecosystem of infrastructure, tooling and projects.
Quickly verify code before deployment creates conditions for moving to the aptos ecosystem. From a web2 error start, the move is now -primed today to grow defi.
Opinion by: Alex Nguyen, CEO in Vibrantx.
This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be done as legal or investment advice. The views, attitudes, and opinions expressed here are unique and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of the cointelegraph.
