Blog

Banks can hide errors with finger fat but crypto is transparent


Paxos’ accidental minting of $300 trillion pyusd on Wednesday, while no doubt about it, serves as a case study in why blockchain can shine a light on traditional banking.

On Wednesday, Paxos made a mistake PayPal minted $300 trillion worth of USD (PYUSD) StableCoin, describing it as an “internal technical error.”

Importantly, however, blockchain allowed its error to be quickly identified and corrected.

The incident occurred on October 15 at 7:12 PM UTC, and the entire amount was burned in just 22 minutes, while the audience was immediately caught.

Source: Ted Pillows

The same cannot be said for the traditional banking sector.

“Mistakes happen in every financial system – the difference with blockchain is that it’s visible, traceable, and quickly corrected,” Kate Cooper, the CEO of OKX Australia, told Cointelegraph. “That transparency is a strength, not a flaw,” he added.

Cooper, who spent nearly a decade as an executive at both Australia’s largest banks Prior to pivoting to crypto, the Paxos incident was said to highlight how open and transparent the blockchain is Transform finance.

“As a former banker, I see this as proof that visibility builds trust. The same rail that exposes an error can also strengthen governance and modernize how value moves through the financial system.”

A level of accountability that is “unheard of” in traditional banking

Ryne Saxe, the CEO of Crosschain StableCoin Liquidity Platform Eco, noted that the blockchain offers a level of accountability rarely found in traditional finance.

“Perhaps an overlooked aspect of Onchain StableCoin’s economic inevitability is the benefit of transparency demanded from financial providers. It’s an extreme case, but it’s still instructive,” Saxe told Cointelegraph.

“This level of transparency, and real time coordination, is unheard of in today’s central banking economy.”

Banks have a history of finger fat transactions

In April 2024, Citigroup accidentally credit $ 81 trillion in the account of a client instead of $ 281, which took time to reverse the transaction. The media didn’t catch wind until nearly 10 months later.

In the same month, another Citigroup employee almost transferred $6 billion to a wealth client after pasting a customer account number into the Payment Amount box. It also took 10 months to report the incident.