Legally from Openaii may be the production of joint sensitive information and documents with ChatgPT artificial intelligence, the CEO of Openai Sam Altman warns.
Altman is the most prominent privacy gap as a “huge issue” during interview With PodCaster Theo von last week, he revealed that, unlike talks with therapists, lawyers or doctors who have legal concession protection, with talks with Chatgpt Currently they have no such protection.
“And at the present time, if you talk to a therapist, lawyer or doctor about these problems, there is a legal concession for that … and we haven’t tried it yet when you speak to ChatGPT.”
He added that if you talk to Chatgpt about “the most sensitive things”, then there is a lawsuit, “we can be required to produce this.”
Altman’s comments come in a background to increase the use of artificial intelligence for psychological support and medical and financial advice.
“I think this is very tight,” German said. privacy For your conversations with artificial intelligence that we do with a therapist or anything else. “
There is no legal framework for Amnesty International
Altman also expressed the need for a legal policy framework for Amnesty International, saying that this is a “huge issue.”
“This is one of the reasons that make me afraid sometimes to use certain things of artificial intelligence because I do not know how much I want to put, because I don’t know who will get it.”
Related to: OpenAi experts ignore the acceptable ChatgPt acceptable
He believes that there should be the same concept of privacy for artificial intelligence conversations as it exists with therapists or doctors, and policymakers who spoke with them agree that a solution is needed and requires a quick procedure.
Water monitoring concerns
Altman also expressed his concerns about further monitoring of the accelerated adoption of Amnesty International.
He said: “I am concerned that we are more than the world’s artificial intelligence, and the more monitoring the world wants,” the governments will want to ensure that people do not use technology for terrorism or nefarious purposes.
He said that for this reason, it was not necessary that the privacy be absolute, and it was “fully prepared to give up some privacy for collective safety,” but there was a warning.
“History is that the government takes this way away, and I am really tense.”
magazine: Increasing numbers of users take LSD with ChatGPT: AI Eye
publish_date
