Hidden risks for updated fixed programs

Opinion
Crypting security is the specified time bomb. The updated fixed programs may be just a match that illuminates the valves.
The governor of the sacred cup devices has become the self -reduction, the final maintaining against the infiltrators, the fraudsters, and even the transcendence of the government. However, there is an uncomfortable fact that most people ignore: fixed program updates are not just safety corrections.
They are potential background devices, waiting for a person – whether it is pirates, a rogue developer or a shaded third party – for its rush open.
Every time you pay the device wallet factory update, users are forced to choose. Click this update button and hope for the best, or refuse to update and risk using old programs with unknown weaknesses. Either way, it’s a gamble.
In encryption, bad gambling can mean waking up an empty wallet.
Fixed software updates are not always your friend
Fixed software update looks like proper logic. More security! Less mistakes! Better user experience!
Here’s the thing: Every update is also an opportunity not only to provide a wallet but for anyone who has strength or motivation, to tamper with this process.
Dreaming of infiltrators of the weaknesses in the fixed programs. The accelerated or audited updated update can make almost small imperceptible defects – those sitting in the background, pending the right moment to spend money. And the best part? Users will never know what hit them.
Then there is a more anxious possibility: deliberate background factors.
Hadith: hArdware Wallet Ledger helps the opponent Trezor to solve the security exposure
Technology companies have been forced to include the government’s monitoring tools. What makes anyone think that the maker makers are exempt? If the organizational agency – or what is worse, is a criminal organization – you want to access special keys, then fixed program updates are the perfect attack transmission. One hidden job. One convincing line of the code.
That’s all it takes. Do you still think that fixed feature updates are not harmful?
The weakness points are already exploited
This is not some scenario on the Day of Resurrection. It has already happened.
Ledger, one of the largest names in Crypto Security, was a major security crisis in 2018 when the security researcher Salim Rashid was Weakness This allowed the attackers to replace the fixed program for Dagger Nano and kidnap the special keys. Nearly a million devices were in danger before the repair was made. The frightening part? There was no way for users to see if their devices had already been at risk.
In 2023, Onekey He suffered from a similar nightmare. The infiltrators have proven that fixed programs can be cracked in only seconds. No encryption – this time. But what if the real attackers found the defect first?
Then he came Dark skippy“Exploitation, with fixed-based attack attacks to a completely new level. With only two signed transactions, infiltrators can extract the phrase the entire seed for the user-without starting from one warning. If it is possible to easily process the fixtures update, how can anyone make sure that their origins are safe?
The hidden price of the updated fixed programs
In order to be fair, not all fixed programs are safety disasters. The professor’s notebook uses a special operating system and a safe potential for the elements for additional protection now. Trezor takes an open source approach, allowing society to examine its fixed program. ColdCard and bitbox02 give users manual control of updates, which reduces – but does not cancel – risks.
Here is the real question: Can users be 100 % sure that the update will not provide a deadly defect?
Some governor decided to eliminate the risks completely. TANGEM is charged with fixed and unprecedented fixed programs, which means that its symbol can never be changed as soon as the device leaves the factory. No updates. No spots.
Of course, this approach has its bodies. If the weakness is discovered, there is no way to fix it. But in security, forecasting issues.
True encryption security means restoring control
The value of the encryption market reached $ 2.79 trillion as of March 2025. With this money on the table, Internet criminals, rogue informed and excessive governments are always looking for weaknesses. The makers of the device portfolio should focus on security.
The choice of the devices wallet like gambling with special keys should not feel. It should not involve blind confidence in the company’s ability to pay updates responsibly. It is worth users more than a mysterious cleansing. They deserve security models that put control over the place to which he belongs – with them.
Security is not about comfort. It is related to control. Any system that requires trust in unknown developers, uninterrupted updates, or fixed programs that can be changed as desired? This is not control. This is a responsibility.
The only real way to maintain a safe hardware wallet? Remove guessing. Migrate blind confidence. Always look for developers wallpapers, check their record of safety accidents, and find out how they dealt with weaknesses in the past. Adhere to verified facts – security should not depend on the assumptions.
Opinion: Igor ZemTSOV, chief technology official in TBCC.
This article is intended for general information purposes and does not aim to be and should not be considered legal or investment advice. The opinions, ideas and opinions expressed here are alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.
publish_date