Bybit and Safe Custed contradict those who blame $ 1.5 billion in hacking

Exchange of crypt currency bybit Forensic review published In penetration last week at a value of $ 1.5 billion, and revealed that its systems did not infiltrate that the case had arisen from the safe infrastructure at risk.
Bybit concluded from the review that “a safe developer accreditation data has been at risk”, which allowed the Lazarus Group in Piracy to unveiled to the safe portfolio and then deceive the bybit staff in signing the malicious treatment.
However, a person familiar with Coindesk told that although the portfolio infrastructure is at risk by social engineering, the penetration could not have been “not signed” on treatment. The term refers to a mechanism that is approved by the treatment of the smart contract without a comprehensive knowledge of its contents.
Also safe He issued a statement Saying that “safe smart contracts [were] It was not affected, an attack was carried out by bargaining on a safe developer {wallet} that affected the bybit account.
It reflects the back and forth between the two companies from Wazirx and Liminal Custard, which Blame each other After exploiting $ 230 million last July.
The data on the series that was analyzed by Zachxbt appears that Lazaros is Washing Stolen money, with 920 wallets currently wet with illegal gains. The money, perhaps inadvertently, was attracted to stolen money from the breakthroughs targeting PHEMEX and Poloniex, and linking the Lazarus group with the three.
Read more: Bybit announces a “war on Lazaros” because it is a group effort to freeze the stolen money
publish_date