The US Securities and Exchange Commission staff have provided a new guide around the most common staking crypto activities, saying they are not violating security laws.
THE SEC’S DIVISION OF CORPORATION FINANCE Says In a statement by May 29 staff that “Protocol Staking Protocol Activities” such as Crypto Staked In a proof-of-stake blockchain, “there is no need to register with commission transactions under the Securities Act,” or fall within “one of the exceptions of the Securities Act from registering.”
It added Staking rewards are compensation For a service provided by node operators, not the income obtained from “other ‘efforts or management,” and did not fall under security regulation.
Custodial staking is also not classified as a security offer because carers have no direct role in deciding how much staked and act only as “staking -related agents,” according to division staff.
Division staff added that it also does not view staking services, Like a fallPayment schedules, as security, stalwart and reward, prevailing, and rewarding them that “only administrative or ministerial in nature.”
Other forms of staking, such as liquid staking and restoration, were not addressed and staffed staff said its statement was “no legal force or impact.”
During Solana’s Accelerate Conference in New York in May, crypto industry groups SEC has been urged to issue formal guidance In staking, regulatory uncertainty is mentioned for web3 infrastructure providers.
A commissioner in favor, one against
Republican Sec Commissioner and the agency’s Crypto Task Force led to Hester Peirce Says The guide is a “welcome clarification for staking-as-a-service stakers and service providers.”
“The uncertainty about views on staking regulation has discouraged Americans to do so because of fear of breaking security laws,” he said.
“The artificially forced participation in the agreed network and suspected of decentralization, censorship resistance, and credible neutrality of proof-of-stake blockchains.”
Related: SEC staff provide guide to how crypto security laws apply
Meanwhile, SEC’s single Democrat Commissioner, Caroline Creshaw, Slammed The guidance, stating that “it failed to deliver a reliable roadmap for determining whether a staking service” is an investment contract under security laws, as specified by Howey Test.
“The review of staff may reflect what some laws want, but it is not square in the court’s decisions of staking and the prolonged Howey that they have been based on,” he said.
“This is another example of this continuous fake of this SEC until we make this crypto approach – act on the basis of relying on future changes while ignoring the existing law.”
Magazine: SEC U-Turn to Crypto leaves key questions that are not answered
