A collective statement from 31 Bitcoin Core developers has led to a global debate between Bitcoiners after suggesting a hands-off approach to how the Bitcoin network is used, amid ongoing controversy in non-financial cases.
“This does not endorse or condone use of non-financial data, but is accepted as a system of resistance to censors Says.
Bitcoiners are “out of a position” to put mandates
The letter argues that Bitcoin is a network that “its users defined” and that the major contributors are “not in a position” to delay what software or policies they want. It came in the midst of the ongoing debate about spam inscriptions on the Bitcoin network.
“Being independent to run any software is the basic preservation of the network against coercion,” he added.
While many bitcoiners supported the update with the comment “ack”, others objected.
Jan3 CEO Samson Mow criticized the tone of the letter the same day. She is Says“It is not interesting to just say that” This is what it is now, very bad. “
“The Bitcoin Core Devs changes the network a little bit to enable spam and now it seems to be focusing on the obstacles for spammers,” Mow said. “This statement itself is inappropriate,” he added.
On May 8, Bitcoin Core developers decided to remove a long-term transaction data limit on a network upgrade to allow larger data segments, which some Bitcoiners have seen opening the door in non-financial cases.
Howver, Casa founder Jameson Race defended the letter. Race Says“Core Devs is a group that says we can’t force anyone to run the code they don’t like; here’s our thinking of relay policy and network health.”
“When there is no cohesive message, and this is just a group of independent developers who make individual statements, the Bitcoin core is accused of having” bad public relations, “LOPP said, added:
“Now a joint statement has been published, and people are finding reasons to cry about it.”
Developers argued in the letter better for Bitcoin node software “aimed at having a realistic idea of what will end in the next block, rather than trying to intervene between the transaction creators and miners to weaken the activity that is more harmful to a technical level.” This is to add:
“As we acknowledge that this view is not held worldwide by all users and developers, this is our sincere belief that it is in the best interests of Bitcoin and its users, and we hope that our users will come up.”
Related: Is a bitcoin price rally possible at $ 150k possible by the end of the year?
Bitcoiner Carl Horton Says“It’s pretty” coin “not a bit” bucket “or bit” store “or whatever the general data store you have in mind. It’s a” peer to peer electronic cash system. “
Meanwhile, Bitcoin core developer Luke Dashjr criticized the purposes of the transaction relay policy outlined in the statement. “The purposes of the transaction relay listed are usually all wrong,” DashJR Says.
“Predicting what the mine will be is a centralized goal. It is expected that spam is mined is the defeat. Helping spam to spread is harmful,” Dashjr said.
Developers said the main purpose of the transaction relay was predicting what Bitcoin transactions were mine, “speeding the block” for transactions that are expected to be mine, and helping bitcoin miners to learn about paid transactions.
Magazine: Baby Boomers worth $ 79t finally riding with Bitcoin
