The ‘Bitcoin Standard’ with -Set supports Dev’s funding to make spamming bitcoin costly
The economist and author of the Bitcoin Standard, Saifean Ammous, weighed on the ongoing debate about spam inscriptions on the Bitcoin network, suggesting that he “discard some Sat” to fund a full-time developer demonstrated in making Bitcoin spamming more difficult and expensive.
Ammous made the comments in response to a thread initiated by pseudonymous developer GrassfedBitcoin, who called for the Bitcoin core to combine the pulling request #28408, enable node operators that could easily filter inscriptions.
According to GrassfedBitcoin, the lack of inscription filtering tools contributes to unnecessary blockchain bloat and drops bitcoin (Btc) The role as a financial protocol.
“No one runs a node who wants to restore inscriptions,” he writethat the OP_RETURN’S LIMITED LIMITATION has been justified in the past under incorrect assumptions. He pushed for a configure, default policy that distracted the use of Bitcoin for storing JPEGs instead of financial data.
Blockstream CEO Adam Back challenged the proposal, describing the filtering of the inscription as a “weapon race.” He noted that the spam data that was greeted in Bitcoin transactions could be endless to change using code structures, which require constant updates on filtering tools.
Related: Bitcoin’s ordinances vs
Ammous compares Bitcoin’s spam to email
Ammous compared the Bitcoin spam issue to email spam – another weapon race society continued to fight without turning away the system.
“It’s not easy, but it’s worth trying to help spammers’ losses faster,” Ammous said. He argued that the fight against the spam was not a censorship, noting that the node operators had already refused the invalid transactions.
“So a node runner looking to remove Retards ‘spam is less valid than the Retards’ SPAM,” he added.
The debate has drawn the commentary from other users. One participant suggested that the main developers treat spam-coding employees at some startups as “unwilling QA engineers” and simply unable to prevent every trick they put in.
Ammous even took it, suggesting “delete” the work of the developers who were building spam tools and even renting out of coders to fill their systems.
The conversation reflects the ongoing tightening of the Bitcoin community with the desired use of the network. In inscriptions that continue to congestion of the network, calls for technical countermeasures – and pointed to the critics of defensive spams – are growing strongly.
In the February 4 report, Mempool Research said The adoption of inscriptions can drive bitcoin network’s average block size as high as 4 megabytes (MB) Each block, higher than the current averages.
The average size of the Bitcoin block – the amount of data per block posted on the public network ledger – is currently around 1.5 MB.
Magazine: Arthur Hayes $ 1m Bitcoin Tip, Altcoins ‘Strong Rally’ Looms: Hodler’s Digest, May 11 – 17
