80,000 Moved BTC: What does that mean?
On July 4, 2025, eight Satoshi -ra Bitcoin wallets moved a total of 80,000 BTC. Each purse contains 10,000 BTCs, which emit an inevitable disturbance in the cryptocurrency space.
The Satoshi period was generally considered to be covering the years 2009 to 2011. At that time, Bitcoin (Btc) can be transferred or mined to regular computer processors. Eight dormant bitcoin wallets Each sent a transaction of nearly 10,000 BTC recently. It leads to speculation -haaka that Threats from quantum computing caused by shift.
Coins are not sent directly to cryptocurrency exchanges. They went to the new SegWit addressessuggesting a security upgrade. Segwit addresses are thought to be securer against threats in volume than adults. Old addresses use pay-to-public-key (P2PK) or re-used P2PK hash (P2PKH), which is weaker.
Some X posts have suggested that the transition may show a security violation or concern as a whole. However, these claims have no evidence and apparent speculation.
Between July 14 and July 15, 2025, just 10 days after the large movement, the purse -owned purse sent a total of 28,600 BTC, which now costs more than $ 3 billion, at the Galaxy Digital. To date, 9,000 BTCs have been sold, probably triggered a downtrend on July 15, when the BTC dropped nearly 5% from the latest full time of $ 123,000.
Do you know? Bitcoin’s price in 2011 changed between $ 0.78 and $ 3.37 when the whale bought Bitcoin. On average $ 2.45 per Bitcoin, 80,000 BTC costs the whale of an initial investment of $ 197,200. At this price of approximately $ 118,000, the whale BTC costs $ 9.44 billion, an increase of approximately 4,800,000%.
What is the threat of volume to bitcoin?
Volume technology is a threat to Bitcoin as it can compromise the private keys of your purse. It can potentially risk all the bitcoins you have in that purse.
Many believe that computers can break the Bitcoin network and bring a serious risk to its safety. Bitcoin developers upgrade the system to deal with future risks, even if the real threat is still years away. They focus on the dormant purses of Bitcoin, as they are more at risk from attacks as a whole.
Quantum can take advantage of the vulnerability of the asymmetry that protects Bitcoin purse. This includes Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) Bitcoin used for security.
Bitcoin purses are that -secure of ECDSA to produce a pair of Private keys of public. If the ECDSA algorithm is compromised, then your bitcoins are at risk. Experts think that practical attacks can occur in five to 20 years and view 2030-2048 as possible dates.
Old wallets are the most vulnerable to a volume attack, as they use P2PK or re -used P2PKH addresseswhich public keys are exposed. Approximately 5.9 million BTC (approximately 25% of the supply) is at P2PK or re -used P2PKH addresses; Therefore, coins are vulnerable to future volume attacks.
The 80,000 transferred BTC came from P2PK addresses. Their public keys have not been exposed as they are old bitcoin transactions that first spent. This means that they are safe in that time at that time. Moving them to Segwit focuses on further security improvement.
Bitcoin developers, led by Casa founder and technology official Jameson Lopp, suggested a Bitcoin’s (BIP) improvement proposal (BIP) To meet the potential threat of quantum computing to bitcoin security. The proposal aims to protect the network by freezing and phating out of purses that are vulnerable to volume attacks, which can compromise around 25% of Bitcoin’s supply, including approximately 1 million BTC held by Satoshi Nakamoto.
Bitcoin whale is not active for 14 years
Arkham Bitcoin Whale Analysis reviewed eight wallets and found that they were among the same creatures. It has sparked speculation -who is the latest whale of this bitcoin.
A crypto whale is an individual or creature that holds a large amount of a particular cryptocurrency, which is often sufficient to influence market prices. A Bitcoin Whale Who all of a sudden moves of 80,000 BTC after 14 years of inactivity will not be noticed. Bitcoin whale trackers review data and transactions, but as an open ledger, the blockchain can be seen by all.
Weak -suspected activity was recorded on the day before the main transfer of BTC. A transaction of 10,000 Bitcoin Cash (Bch) is made from a related purse cluster, perhaps to try private access to the key. It raised the speculation -haka a potential hack, as mentioned by Coinbase Director Conor Grogan, though no evidence has been found.
Ngunit ang isa sa mga pinaka -suportadong teorya ay na ito ay ang paggalaw ng Bitcoin ni Roger Ver dahil sa kanyang maagang pagkakasangkot sa Bitcoin mula noong 2011. Si Ver, na kilala rin bilang “Bitcoin Jesus,” ay naaresto sa Espanya sa mga singil sa pag -iwas sa buwis noong Abril 2024. Siya ay inakusahan na hindi nagbabayad ng $ 48 milyon sa mga buwis sa pagbebenta ng $ 240 milyon na nagkakahalaga ng bitcoin.
He was released from the bail in June 2025, just before the movement occurred, which sparked an additional speculation that the wallets were his.
Do you know? These 10,000-BTC movements come from eight wallets. Each one marked the biggest transaction in Bitcoin ever. The previous note for the largest single transaction in Bitcoin history is only 3,700 BTC.
What are OP_RETURN messages?
OP_RETURN messages are a bitcoin blockchain feature that gives users to gem a small amount of data, with a maximum size of 80 bytes, directly in a transaction, marking the output as unnoticed.
From July 1 to July 4, 2025, four OP-Return messages was added to the Bitcoin blockchain. These messages are sent to many purses at the same time.
The first, on July 1, 2025, at 00:30, reads:
“Legal notice: We took this purse and its contents.” .
Three additional messages were sent over the next few days, ending on July 4, 2025. A message issued a purse of an ultimatum. They need to prove the owner by making an onchain transaction with their private keys in Sept. 30, 2025.
There is no proof of a hack. This is more likely to be a planned spam campaign. This may deceive the purse with the transfer of funds to show control. Scammers often target dormant wallets, claiming they are abandoned.
The spam campaign has contributed to speculation on various online platforms. Some haka -haka That OP_RETURN messages are a “legal stunt” or scam to force the whale owned to disclose themselves.
Other Called The messages “Blockchain Graffiti.” This is often a way to fill the chain with bold data. However, their specific focus and timing show a clear purpose.
