Update: The cto of tradingview said The cointelegraph in the comments that the reports of a bug were inaccurate, and the Twitter user partially removed his previous claims that the tool was damaged.
The famous TradingView chart review chart has been reported to contain a bug in Fibonacci Retracement Technical analysis Tool, according to a tweet by self-expressed certified elliott wave analyst cryptoteddybear Na -Published On June 13th.
The Elliott wave The principle is a type of technical analysis for predicting prices in financial markets by looking at repeated patterns.
In a video he’s that -upload On YouTube, the analyst explained that the tool produces linear calculations when on logarithmic charts, which he cited was a significant issue for Elliot waves traders. The official Twitter account of the company behind the Pag -Chart service replied to his Tweet, announcement That the issue is being investigated, to which CryptotedDybear replied:
“Thanks @tradingview To finally take seriously to this issue. “
The first bug reports, which have been posted more than five years ago (in November 2014) on the consumer community platform, were reported to be ignored by the company. Another report submitted to the same platform, dated June 3, 2017, saw the official answer of the TradingView account in Thread:
“Hello, you’re right. We have a planned task to fix it. Thanks for bringing it to our attention.”
However, the problem seems to be unresolved. Cryptoteddybear claims That a company representative told him that he asked the technicians to increase the priority given in the bug resolution.
As cointelegraph recently reportedTradingview is one of the platforms that added the “Cix100” index-an AI-powered index for 100 most powerful performing cryptocurrencies and tokens.
At the beginning of the current month, Cryptocurrency Analytics Company coins metrics announced That got the digital asset index firm Bletchley Index and plans to launch crypto smart beta indexes.
As for the press time, TradingView did not respond to a request for comment.
